U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Anjulo-Jaramillo

United States v. Anjulo-Jaramillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 10, 2010 · King, Stewart, Haynes
381 F. App'x 352

United States v. Anjulo-Jaramillo

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Alexander Anjulo-Jaramillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in *353 accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Anjulo-Jaramillo has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Anjulo-Jaram-illo’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel has shown that there is no nonfrivolous issue for appeal concerning whether Anjulo-Jaramillo was entitled to a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the amendments to the cocaine base guidelines provision or Amendments 707 and 709. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *353 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.