Napoleon Lajuan Randall challenges his guilty-plea conviction for attempt to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). Randall claims his trial counsel was ineffective because: at sentencing, counsel denied Randall was the drug transaction’s financial source, despite Randall’s admission in the factual basis, resulting in the loss of a three-level acceptance-of-responsibility reduction; and, counsel failed to investigate the facts of the case and erroneously advised Randall concerning the charges against him, causing his guilty plea to be unknowing and involuntary.

The record is insufficiently developed, however, to allow consideration now of Randall’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; they generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations”. United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Pierce, 959 F.2d 1297, 1301 (5th Cir. 1992)).

AFFIRMED.