Mario Reyes-Burgos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Reyes-Burgos contends that his within-guidelines sentence was unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the unwarranted sentencing disparity that exists between defendants sentenced in the Western District of Texas, which does not have a fast-track program, and defendants sentenced in districts that do have such a program. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve the issue for further review.

As Reyes-Burgos concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 563 (5th Cir. 2008), where we held that the disparity caused by fast-track programs is not “unwarranted” and does not provide grounds for a sentence reduction. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.