This is an appeal from the district court’s order granting Defendant-Appel-lees’ summary judgment motion. Plaintiff-Appellant ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Inc., (“ATP”) challenges the decision of the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“Board”), which had affirmed the Minerals Management Service’s (“MMS”) 1 denial of ATP’s request for a Suspension of Operations. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM.

We review a district court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard to the agency decision as the district court. See Hayward v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 536 F.3d 376, 379 (5th Cir. 2008). We must uphold an agency decision unless it is “arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A); Enron Oil & Gas Co. v. Lujan, 978 F.2d 212, 215 (5th Cir. 1992).

We have reviewed the briefs and record in this case, and heard oral argument. We hold that the Board’s decision affirming the denial of the Suspension of Operations was not arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise at odds with the law. The MMS followed its regulations in denying ATP’s request for a Suspension of Operations because ATP did not have an executed drilling-rig contract, an approved Exploration Plan, or an Application for Permit to Drill.

AFFIRMED.