Perpetua Ramiro Pagallaman is a native and citizen of the Philippines. She petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), dismissing her appeal from the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) that she is removable and not eligible for discretionary relief from removal. Pagallaman has waived any challenge to the IJ’s determination that she is removable and not eligible for cancellation of removal by failing to challenge this determination in her petition for review. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). Further, this court lacks jurisdiction to review Pagalla-man’s claims that her procedural due process rights were violated because she failed to present the claims to the BIA. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, the petition for review is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IN PART and DENIED IN PART.