United States v. Fred Flores, III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Fred Flores, III, 399 F. App'x 10 (5th Cir. 2010)

United States v. Fred Flores, III

Opinion

Case: 10-40083 Document: 00511266915 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/19/2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 19, 2010 No. 10-40083 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRED FLORES, III,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-96-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Defendant-Appellant Fred Flores, III, federal prisoner # 12212-078, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) for a sentence reduction based on the recent amendments to the crack cocaine provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines. The government has filed a motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits. Flores’s sentencing range was not determined under the crack cocaine provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 10-40083 Document: 00511266915 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/19/2010 No. 10-40083

Accordingly, he is not eligible for a reduced sentence. See § 3582(c); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2) & cmt. (n.1(A)). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and its alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished