Adolfo Martinez-Padron (Martinez) appeals the 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry. Martinez argues that the district court improperly enhanced his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(D) based on its determination that his prior Texas conviction for cocaine possession was a felony as defined by the Sentencing Guidelines. More specifically, Martinez contends that the district court erred because its conclusion that his prior state conviction was for a felony offense relied exclusively upon the characterization of his offense in the presentence report.

Martinez did not object to the characterization of his prior conviction as a felony or challenge the imposition of the four-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(D). Accordingly, we review only for plain error. United States v. Garda-Arellano, 522 F.3d 477, 480 (5th Cir. 2008). Our determination whether there is error is “based on the record before us as supplemented with the state-court documents” related to Martinez’s prior conviction. Id.

Guideline § 2L1.2 provides for a four-level increase if the defendant has been previously convicted of a felony offense. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(D). State-court documents for Martinez’s prior conviction, with which the Government has supplemented the record on appeal, show that Martinez pleaded guilty to possession of less than one gram of cocaine, a violation of Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b). This offense is a state jail felony punishable by no less than 180 days nor more than two years in prison. See § 481.115(b); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.35(a). Accordingly, the offense qualifies as a “felony” for purposes of § 2L1.2. § 2L1.2, comment, (n.2); United States v. Riverar-Perez 322 F.3d 350, 352 (5th Cir. 2003). The application of the four-level enhancement was not error, plain or otherwise.

AFFIRMED.