United States v. Israel Cabrera-Ortiz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Israel Cabrera-Ortiz, 366 F. App'x 509 (5th Cir. 2010)

United States v. Israel Cabrera-Ortiz

Opinion

Case: 09-40265 Document: 00511027505 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED February 12, 2010 No. 09-40265 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISRAEL CABRERA-ORTIZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:08-CR-1663-1

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Israel Cabrera-Ortiz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

(1967). Cabrera-Ortiz has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Cabrera-Ortiz’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 09-40265 Document: 00511027505 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2010 No. 09-40265

allegations.” United States v. Cantwell,

470 F.3d 1087, 1091

(5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cabrera-Ortiz’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished