United States v. Vereen
United States v. Vereen
Opinion
Bianca Fabione Vereen, federal prisoner # 06290-043, appeals the district court’s denial of her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce her sentence based on the amendments to the crack cocaine Guideline. Vereen’s appeal waiver does not bar *518 this appeal. See United States v. Cooley, 590 F.3d 293, 296-97 (5th Cir. 2009). The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED.
Vereen argues that, in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the district court was authorized to reduce her sentence based on the new advisory guidelines range and after consideration of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. She also contends that her career offender status did not preclude the court from reducing her sentence. These issues are foreclosed by this court’s decisions in United States v. Anderson, 591 F.3d 789, 790-91 (5th Cir. 2009), and United States v. Doublin, 572 F.3d 235, 236-39 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 517, 175 L.Ed.2d 366 (2009). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *518 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.