U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Rodney Hammer

United States v. Rodney Hammer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 22, 2010

United States v. Rodney Hammer

Opinion

Case: 09-10649 Document: 00511085527 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 20, 2010 No. 09-10649 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RODNEY HAMMER, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-3-8

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Rodney Hammer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hammer has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .

R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.