U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels LLC

Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 18, 2010 · Benavides, Davis, Dennis, Elrod, Garza, Haynes, Jolly, Jones, King, Owen, Prado, Smith, Southwick, Stewart
601 F.3d 621; 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1856; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5986; 2010 WL 1039346 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Jennifer Jean Rosenbaum (argued), New Orleans Workers’ Ctr. for Racial Justice Legal Dept., Trade L. Washington, Louisiana Justice Institute, New Orleans, LA, Mary Bauer, Southern Poverty Law Ctr., Immigrant Justice Project, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Leslie Weill Ehret, Ellen Shirer Kovach (argued), Suzanne Marie Risey, Frilot, L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants-Appellants., Ann Margaret Pointer (argued),John Eugene Thompson, Fisher & Phillips, L.L.P., Atlanta, GA, Keith M. Pyburn, Jr., Timothy Hugh Scott, Fisher & Phillips, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for Amici Curiae, Amelia Island Plantation, American Hotel & Lodging Ass’n, Basin Harbor Club, Beaver Run Resort & Conference Ctr., The Broadmoor, Best Western Grand Canyon Squire Inn, Cheyenne Mountain Resort, Florida Fruit & Vegetable Ass’n, Georgia Fruit & Vegetable Ass’n, Homestead Resort, Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, Kiawah Island & Golf Resort, Mandoki Hospitality Group, Maryland Nursery & Landscape Ass’n, Mid-Atlantic Solutions, Inc., National Council of Agricultural Employers, Ocean Reef Club, The Sagamore, Stein Erickson Lodge and Virginia Agricultural Employers Ass’n,, Catherine K. Ruckelshaus, National Employment Law Project, New York City, for Amici Curiae, Interfaith Worker Justice, New Orleans Workers’ Ctr. For Racial Justice and National Employment Law Project., Diane A. Heim, U.S. Dept, of Labor, Office of Sol., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae, Secretary of Labor.

Castellanos-Contreras v. Decatur Hotels LLC

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion 559 F.3d 332 (5th Cir. 2009)).

(Opinion on Panel Rehearing, 576 F.3d 274 (5th.Cir. 2009))

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.1 BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.