U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

Morgan v. Swanson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 17, 2010 · Benavides, Clement, Davis, Dennis, Elrod, Garza, Haynes, Jolly, Jones, King, Owen, Prado, Smith, Southwick, Stewart

628 F.3d 705; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 26016; 2010 WL 5175508 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

William Charles Bundren (argued), Wm. Charles Bundren & Associates, Frisco, TX, Jeffrey Carl Mateer, Gen. Counsel, Hiram S. Sasser, Liberty Institute, Plano, TX, Clyde Moody Siebman, Siebman, Burg, Phillips & Smith, L.L.P., Sherman, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Thomas Phillip Brandt (argued), Joshua Alan Skinner, Fanning, Harper, Martin-son, Brandt & Kutchin, P.C., Dallas, TX, Charles J. Crawford, Director, Abernathy, Roeder, Boyd & Joplin, P.C., McKinney, TX, for Defendants-Appellants., Christopher Blewer Gilbert, Thompson & Horton, L.L.P., Houston, TX, for Amicus Curiae, Texas Ass’n of Sch. Bds. Legal Assistance Fund., Paul D. Clement (argued), Ashley Charles Parrish, King & Spalding, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae, Edmonds and Snodgrass.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.