U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Foley

United States v. Foley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2010 · Haynes, King, Stewart
372 F. App'x 492

United States v. Foley

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Ray Foley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Foley has filed a response and moves for the appointment of counsel. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Foley’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Foley’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998) Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.