Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Patino

United States v. Patino
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2010 · Haynes, Prado, Smith
373 F. App'x 519

United States v. Patino

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Louis Patino has moved for leave to *520withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Patino has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *520the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑