U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Holper

United States v. Holper
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2010 · Haynes, Prado, Smith
376 F. App'x 362

United States v. Holper

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mark Holper has moved for leave to with*363draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Holper has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Holper’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.