U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Diane Dixon

United States v. Diane Dixon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 6, 2011 · Owen, Per Curiam, Prado, Wiener
421 F. App'x 392

United States v. Diane Dixon

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Diane Michele Dixon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dixon has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Dixon’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for *393 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Dixon’s motion for release pending appeal is DENIED. See 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cut. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.