Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ismael Gaspari-Corona presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. London, 568 F.3d 553, 564 (5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, — U.S. *376 -, 131 S.Ct. 631, 178 L.Ed.2d 507 (2010). The Supreme Court adopted the position advanced in London. See Abbott v. United States, — U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 18, 23, 178 L.Ed.2d 348 (2010) (holding that a defendant is subject to a mandatory, consecutive sentence for a conviction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) even if the defendant received a higher mandatory minimum on a different count of conviction). The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.