Antonio Tyson, Louisiana prisoner # 331834, has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (COA) challenging his convictions for forcible rape, armed robbery, and aggravated burglary. Tyson seeks to appeal the denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion.

To the extent that a COA is required, it is denied. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). To the extent that a COA is not required, the district court’s judgment denying the Rule 60(b) motion is affirmed. See Bailey v. Cain, 609 F.3d 763, 767 (5th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 931, 178 L.Ed.2d 774 (2011); Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. Unit A Jan. 1981). The motion for appointment of counsel is also denied. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261-62 (5th Cir. 1986) (per curiam); Schwander v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 494, 502-03 (5th Cir. 1985).

AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.