U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2011

United States v. James Harrison, Jr.

United States v. James Harrison, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2011 · Garza, Jolly, Per Curiam, Stewart
428 F. App'x 381

United States v. James Harrison, Jr.

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent James T. Harrison, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Harrison has filed a response, moving for the appointment of new counsel. This motion, however, is untimely. Cf. United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Harrison’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.