The plaintiff sued for alleged injuries suffered in a traffic accident. The jury found no negligence, and the district court denied post-verdict motions and entered judgment for defendants. On appeal, the plaintiff argues only that the court should have granted the post-verdict motions.

We affirm, essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order & Reasons denying the post-verdict motions. The trial raised largely questions of credibility concerning how the accident occurred. The district court’s order explains why the verdict is supported by the record and the applicable law.

AFFIRMED.