Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Aaron Ray Miller presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254, 258, 261-62 & n. 6 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that proof of knowledge of the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act is not required for a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a), and which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to those registration requirements. See also United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255, 258-60 & n. 3 (5th Cir. 2010). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.