United States v. David Metcalf
Opinion
The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. Appellant concedes his arguments are foreclosed by circuit precedent; to wit: United States v. Johnson, 632 F.3d 912 (5th Cir. 2011); United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255 (5th Cir. 2010); and United States v. Whaley, *255 577 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2009). Appellant also indicates that he raises the arguments for possible Supreme Court review. The judgment of the district court is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. David Glen METCALF, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished