Mary Miller sued her employer for sex *974 and pregnancy discrimination. The district court granted summary judgment for the employer.

The district court explained its ruling in a comprehensive Memorandum Opinion dated May 2, 2011, 2011 WL 1655920. The court concluded, inter alia, that no similarly-situated employee was treated more favorably than was plaintiff. The court also concluded that, even if a prima facie case had been established, the employer brought forth a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its decision to prohibit Miller from working at a particular facility because of her disruptive behavior.

The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.