U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Esparza Alvarez

United States v. Esparza Alvarez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2011 · Benavides, Dennis, Per Curiam, Southwick
446 F. App'x 687

United States v. Esparza Alvarez

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Esparza Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Es-parza Alvarez has filed a response, in which he requests appointment of counsel, and a supplemental response, which we have considered. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Espar-za Alvarez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Esparza Alvarez’s motion to supplement his response is GRANTED, his motions for appointment of counsel and for judicial notice are DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.