U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Jose Cortez-Flores

United States v. Jose Cortez-Flores
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2011 · Benavides, Dennis, Per Curiam, Southwick
446 F. App'x 696

United States v. Jose Cortez-Flores

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Alfredo Cortez-Flores has moved for *697 leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cortez-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.