U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Antonio Jaimes-Herrera

United States v. Antonio Jaimes-Herrera
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 7, 2011

United States v. Antonio Jaimes-Herrera

Opinion

Case: 11-10123 Document: 00511688500 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/07/2011

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 7, 2011 No. 11-10123 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTONIO JAIMES-HERRERA, also known as Mandarino, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-289-3

Before GARZA, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Jaimes-Herrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jaimes-Herrera has filed a response in which he requests the appointment of counsel. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10123 Document: 00511688500 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/07/2011 No. 11-10123 counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED and counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, Jaimes’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.