Patrick A. Jones, federal prisoner # 60763-080, was convicted of three charges related to crack cocaine and was sentenced to serve life in prison. He appeals the district court’s denial of the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition he filed to challenge the collection of the $3000 fine and $300 special assessment he was ordered to pay in connection with his convictions. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and issues of law de novo. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001).

Consistent with his arguments in the district court, Jones maintains that the setting of a payment schedule for his fine and assessment by the BOP amounted to an unconstitutional delegation of the sentencing court’s authority. The sentencing court ordered him to pay a certain sum as a fine and provided that this sum was to be paid immediately. See 18 U.S.C. 3572(d). Consequently, there was no unconstitutional delegation of judicial authority. Jones’s contention that the penalties imposed upon him pursuant to the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program have constitutional significance likewise fails, as none of these punishments “imposes atypical and significant hardship on [him] in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (citations omitted).

AFFIRMED.