Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Ramon Rodriguez-Bermudez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 562-63 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that the disparity in sentences that occurs because some defendants can participate in a fast-track program while others cannot is not “unwarranted” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.