Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Reginald K. Cantly presents arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hampton, 633 F.3d 334, 337-42 & n. 4 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) does not require aggregation of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DE*370NIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.