Manuel Olivas-Guevara appeals his 87-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after removal, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. Olivas contends the district court erred by enhancing his base offense level 16 levels, claiming his Texas conviction for delivery of cocaine does not constitute a drug-trafficking offense under Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i).

As he concedes, because Olivas did not raise this issue in district court, review is only for plain error. E.g., United States v. Henao-Melo, 591 F.3d 798, 801 (5th Cir. 2009). Olivas has not shown error because his contention is foreclosed by United States v. Marban-Calderon, 631 F.3d 210, 212-13 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 129, 181 L.Ed.2d 50 (2011) (holding Texas conviction for delivery of controlled substance, such as cocaine, qualifies as drug-trafficking offense under Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i)).

AFFIRMED.