U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Bouknight

United States v. Bouknight
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2011
454 F. App'x 334

United States v. Bouknight

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Gordon Allen Bouknight has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bouknight has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Bouknight’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to *335withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.