U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Carlos Dominguez-Reyes

United States v. Carlos Dominguez-Reyes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 17, 2012 · Higginbotham, Garza, Southwick
462 F. App'x 446

United States v. Carlos Dominguez-Reyes

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed *447 to represent Carlos Dominguez-Reyes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dominguez-Reyes has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Dominguez-Reyes’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.