David Charles Perio appeals from an adverse summary judgment dismissing his Title VII race discrimination and retaliation claims and his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging a First Amendment retaliation claim.

After a thorough review of the record, consideration of the arguments and diseus *459 sion presented in the briefs, and the arguments presented orally to the Court upon submission, our de novo review convinces us that the district court correctly decided the summary judgment motion in all particulars. Further writing on this appeal would only mirror the findings, analysis, and conclusions made in the district court, and would not aid the parties or the development of our caselaw. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court essentially for the reasons stated in its Order and Reasons for Summary Judgment issued April 29, 2011, 2011 WL 1654262.

AFFIRMED.