U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Edwardo Lopez

United States v. Edwardo Lopez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2012

United States v. Edwardo Lopez

Opinion

Case: 11-51045 Document: 00511904059 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2012

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 28, 2012 No. 11-51045 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff—Appellee v. EDWARDO LOPEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-199-1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Edwardo Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-51045 Document: 00511904059 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2012 No. 11-51045 further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Lopez’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and his motion for leave to file the letter written by his trial counsel and dated April 23, 2012, is GRANTED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.