Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Darryl B. McCullough raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by Setser v. United States, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1463, 182 L.Ed.2d 455 (2012), and United States v. Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531 (5th Cir. 2009). In Setser, the Supreme Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 3584 authorizes a district court to order a federal sentence to run consecutively to a yet-to-be-imposed state sentence. Setser, 132 S.Ct. at 1466-73. In Sykes v. United States, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2267, 2277, 180 L.Ed.2d 60 (2011), the Supreme Court validated our holding in Harrimon, that the Texas offense of evading arrest or detention by use of a vehicle is a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), by holding that a conviction under Indiana’s felony vehicle flight law constituted a violent felony under the ACCA. Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.