United States v. Decarlos Stevenson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Decarlos Stevenson, 488 F. App'x 840 (5th Cir. 2012)

United States v. Decarlos Stevenson

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent De-Carlos Danyelle Paul Stevenson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Stevenson has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Stevenson’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. DeCarlos Danyelle Paul STEVENSON, Also Known as Big Los, Also Known as DeCarlos Stevenson, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished