Francisco Sanchez-Lopez appeals the 60-month sentence imposed after his *558 guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. He argues that the district court committed error by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his prior Texas conviction for aggravated robbery. Because Sanchez-Lopez raised this argument in the district court, our review is de novo. United States v. Sandoval-Ruiz, 543 F.3d 733, 734-35 (5th Cir. 2008).

Under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), a defendant’s base offense level is increased by 16 levels if he was previously deported after a conviction for a crime of violence. The commentary to § 2L1.2 provides that a prior conviction is a crime of violence if it qualifies as an enumerated offense or has “as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.” § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)).

Robbery is an enumerated crime of violence under § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)). In United States v. Santiesteban-Heman-dez, 469 F.3d 376, 378-82 (5th Cir. 2006), we held that the definition of robbery under Texas Penal Code § 29.02 substantially corresponds to the generic, contemporary meaning of robbery and thus qualifies as an enumerated offense under § 2L1.2. Accordingly, it follows that the offense of aggravated robbery, as set forth in § 29.03 of the Texas Penal Code, is also a crime of violence because it includes every element required for a conviction under § 29.02. See § 29.03(a). Sanchez-Lopez therefore has not shown that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii).

AFFIRMED.