The attorney appointed to represent Elizabeth Marchand has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Marchand has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Marchand’s response. Marchand argues *791 that she did not receive three points for acceptance of responsibility, but the record reflects that the court ultimately did award those points. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.