United States v. Carlos Chavez-Flores

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Carlos Chavez-Flores, 489 F. App'x 814 (5th Cir. 2012)
Higginbotham, Smith, Haynes

United States v. Carlos Chavez-Flores

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Carlos Jose Chavez-Flores raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 562-63 (5th Cir. 2008), which rejected the argument that fast track programs create unwarranted disparities between defendants in districts that have the programs and defendants in districts that do not have such programs. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carlos Jose CHAVEZ-FLORES, Also Known as Carlos Jose Chavez, Also Known as Eddy Alejandro Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished