Plaintiff-Appellant Susan Flander, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, *632 sued Defendants-Appellees alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986. The district court referred the matter to a magistrate judge who reviewed and examined Plaintiff-Appellant’s complaint and related filings in considerable detail and recommended that the complaint be summarily dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The district court reviewed the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the magistrate judge and the Plaintiff-Appellant’s objection thereto, then overruled that objection, accepted the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the magistrate judge, denied a motion to compel by Plaintiff-Appellant, and ordered that her complaint be summarily dismissed pursuant to § 1915(e)(2).

We have reviewed the report of the magistrate judge, the rulings of the district court, the filings of the Plaintiff-Appellant, and the remainder of the record. Although we understand and sympathize with the obvious frustration of Plaintiff-Appellant, we are convinced that the rulings of the district court in this case are correct. Accordingly, its judgment of April 11, 2012 must be, in all respects,

AFFIRMED.