United States v. Frederick Holmes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Frederick Holmes, 501 F. App'x 321 (5th Cir. 2012)

United States v. Frederick Holmes

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Frederick D. Holmes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 788, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Holmes’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cra. R. 42.2. Holmes’s request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Frederick D. HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished