United States v. Epifanio Nino

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Epifanio Nino, 501 F. App'x 317 (5th Cir. 2012)
Davis, Higginson, Owen, Per Curiam

United States v. Epifanio Nino

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Epifanio Nino Nino has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. Cali fornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nino has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Nino’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Epifanio Nino NINO, Also Known as Epifanio Nino, Also Known as Epifanio Nino Nino Nino, Also Known as Pual Romero, Also Known as Epifanio Nino-Nino, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished