U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Patricio Toscano

United States v. Patricio Toscano
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 18, 2012 · Davis, Higginson, Owen, Per Curiam
501 F. App'x 339

United States v. Patricio Toscano

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Patricio Flores Toscano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores Toscano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s as *340 sessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to ■withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.