United States v. Tickles
United States v. Tickles
691 F.3d 592; 485 F. App'x 735; 2012 WL 3324280
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
United States v. Tickles
Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
After our opinion was issued in these consolidated cases, the Supreme Court decided Dorsey v. United States, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012). Dorsey held, contrary to our opinion, that the more lenient penalties of the Fair Sentencing Act (“Act”) apply to offenders who committed an offense before the Act was passed, but were sentenced after the Act was enacted. We therefore VACATE and REMAND these cases for resentencing consistent with the Court’s holding in Dorsey.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.