United States v. Rogelio Villanueva
United States v. Rogelio Villanueva
Opinion
Rogelio Jaimes Jaimes Villanueva challenges the sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry of a previously deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in treating his prior conviction for sexual assault of a child under Texas Penal Code § 22.011(a)(2) as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), and as an aggravated felony under § 1326(b)(2), as defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A). Villa-nueva’s arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562-63 & n. 28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013)(No. 12-10695). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.