Luis Alberto Lugo appeals the within-guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Lugo does not argue that his 100 month sentence is substantively unreasonable, but argues only that the district court committed procedural error and incorrectly calculated the applicable guidelines range by imposing a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

Whether a defendant was a leader or organizer under § 3B1.1 is a factual determination that we review for clear error. United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir. 2005). Given the record evidence that Lugo paid his cousin to act as a scout for Lugo’s criminal activities, we cannot say that the district court clearly erred. See id.; United States v. Turner, 319 F.3d 716, 725 (5th Cir. 2003) (“When the evidence demonstrates that a defendant directed another in his drug trafficking activities ... sentence enhancement under § 3B1.1(c) is appropriate.”)

AFFIRMED.