Linas Baranauskas, a native and citizen of Lithuania and an illegal alien, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of (1) the denial by an immigration judge (“D”) of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings and rescind the in absentia removal order issued against him and (2) the denial of his request for sua sponte reopening. There is no dispute that Baranauskas’s motion to reopen was not filed within 180 days after the order of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). In that motion, Baranauskas sought equitable tolling based on alleged misinformation from an immigration consultant.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in construing Baranauskas’s equitable-tolling argument as a request for the IJ to reopen the removal proceedings sua sponte. See Ramos-Bonilla v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 216, 220 (5th Cir. 2008). To the extent Bara-nauskas argues that the BIA erred in dismissing the appeal of the IJ’s denial, the petition for review is DENIED. To the extent Baranauskas challenges the basis for the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal from the IJ’s refusal to reopen, the petition for review is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. See id.