Appealing the judgment in a criminal ease, Aniceto Beltran Vargas raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rhine, 583 F.3d 878, 891 & n. 50 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that a sentencing judge may find by a preponderance of the evidence all the facts necessary to the determination of a sentencing guidelines range. See also United States v. Stevens, 487 F.3d 232, 246 (5th Cir. 2007); United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 793, 798 (5th Cir. 2006). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.