U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Phillip Canada

United States v. Phillip Canada
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 19, 2013

United States v. Phillip Canada

Opinion

Case: 11-10862 Document: 00512146172 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 19, 2013 No. 11-10862 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PHILLIP MARVIN CANADA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:11-CR-1-1

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Phillip Marvin Canada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Canada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10862 Document: 00512146172 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2013 No. 11-10862 excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.