Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Domingo Castellón raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Miller, 665 F.3d 114, 119-23 (5th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2773, 183 L.Ed.2d 643 (2012), which held that “we will not reject [U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2G2.2] as ‘unreasonable’ or ‘irrational’ simply because it is not based on empirical data and even if it leads to some disparities in sentencing.” The Government’s motion for summary af-firmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.